jnhr journal

AND option

OR option



P. Nambisan1, M. Abahussain1,6, E.H. Duthie2, C. Galambos3, B. Zhang4, E. Bukowy5


1. Department of Health Informatics & Administration, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA; 2. Medical College of Wisconsin Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Milwaukee, USA; 3. Helen Bader School of Social Welfare, University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 4. Educational Measurement, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 5. Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, MCW & Froedtert Hospital, Medical Director for the Lutheran Home and Clement Manor Nursing Home, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 6. Department of Ambulance Services, Prince Sultan Bin Abdulaziz College for Emergency Medical Services, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Corresponding author: Priya Nambisan, Department of Health Informatics & Administration, College of Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Milwaukee, Northwest Quadrant Building B, Rm #6410, 2025 East Newport Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53201-0413, Phone: (414) 251-0421, Office Ph: (414) 251-5217; Email: nambisap@uwm.edu

Jour Nursing Home Res 2021;7:55-61
Published online September 17, 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jnhrs.2021.9



Background: The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionately affected the older adult population, especially those in nursing homes (NHs). However, there is also evidence that some NHs fared better than others. Objectives: This study examines a set of nursing home related factors to understand whether these factors are associated with the number of COVID-19 cases. Design: We combined three datasets from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) – the Star Rating Dataset, the Provider Information Dataset, and the COVID-19 Nursing Home Dataset. Setting and Participants: 4390 NHs that responded to the CMS survey. Methods: Data used is from the period of Jan 1–Dec 27, 2020 for all 12 Midwestern states. The measures used were self-reported information on ratings, staff shortages, PPE shortage, number of beds, Registered Nurse (RN), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) hours per resident, star rating and ownership. Results: Of the 4390 NHs in 12 Midwestern states, high performing NHs were less likely to have more than 30 COVID-19 cases versus low-performing facilities for two of the CMS domains (health inspections, 520 NHs [27.6%] vs 1363 NHs [72.4%]; and staffing 773 NHs [41.1%] vs 1110 NHs [58.9%]). There was also a statistically significant association COVID-19 cases and star rating, NH ownership, NH size, RN, LPN, and CNA staffing in NHs (all p ≤ 0.01). NH ownership status persisted as a predictor of COVID 19 cases when controlled for NH size. Conclusions: Our study highlights two interesting findings. A) a statistically significant association between NH ownership structure and COVID-19 cases among residents – for-profit NHs had higher number of COVID-19 cases B) a statistically significant negative association between RN and CNA staffing and COVID-19 cases (i.e., more staffing hours of RNs and CNA correlated with a smaller number of COVID-19 cases) and a statistically significant positive association between LPN staffing and COVID-19 cases. We discuss ensuing policy implications for NHs.

Key words: COVID-19, Nursing homes, staffing hours, for-profit nursing homes.



The COVID-19 pandemic disproportionally affected the older adult population, especially those in nursing homes (NHs). According to a recent AARP report, an estimated 174,000 residents and staff of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities across the country died due to COVID-19 (1). Further complicating the situation, there are reports of under-reporting of nursing home deaths due to COVID-19 from many states (2). While many NHs were reporting COVID-19 cases to state and local public health departments, it was not until April 2020 that they started reporting to the CDC in a standardized format, which may have led to under or inaccurate reporting (3).
To understand how older adults can be protected in nursing homes, it is important to consider the characteristics that make some nursing homes more susceptible to the spread of COVID-19. In many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic has exposed the existing weaknesses of the nursing home system which provides care to some of the frailest and most vulnerable individuals in our society. Some researchers have called this pandemic a ‘case study of infection control’ (4) and studies delving into the factors that contributed to devastating outbreaks can provide critical insights into how this can be prevented in the future.
Nursing homes are prone to infectious outbreaks (e.g., seasonal influenza, norovirus) and there are several factors that make nursing homes highly vulnerable. These factors could range from high number of residents causing crowding, shared bathroom facilities, gathering/common areas to staffing shortages, frequent staff turnover, high resident-to-staff ratios, shortage of PPE, inadequate quality control and poor management (4, 5). In addition, NH residents are typically older adults with multiple chronic conditions such as diabetes, heart disease, pulmonary disease and other functional and cognitive disabilities including frailty (6, 7). Individuals with underlying chronic conditions were particularly vulnerable to contracting COVID-19 (8). Additionally, staff and caregivers in NHs are underpaid, do not get sick leave and move from resident to resident without adequate sanitation control or PPE (4, 9). Given that staff turnover rates are very high in nursing homes, training and maintaining sanitary protocols can also be challenging in this environment (4).
Using datasets available from CMS, which consists of self-reported data from NHs around the country on various factors, many studies (10–14) have reported findings on the factors associated with nursing homes and COVID-19 cases for various time periods in 2020. There have also been several single-state studies e.g. California (15), Connecticut (16) and West Virginia (17), that considered various factors such as star ratings, staffing, CMS quality indicators and PPE shortage. While data from CMS have been analyzed for NHs in Northeastern states (18) and for 30 States (11, 12), no studies have yet focused on NHs in the Midwestern states. Analyzing data from different regions is important as climate, COVID-19 prevalence, COVID-19 related policies and attitude of the population vary from region to region. Further, most existing studies have considered only a narrow time frame (few months in 2020), which may miss valuable information on recurrent NH outbreaks.
This study examines a number of factors such as nursing home ratings, quality of care, staff shortage, PPE shortage, and NH ownership structure (for-profit vs non-profit vs government) to understand whether these factors are associated with COVID-19 cases in NHs in Midwestern states for the entire year of 2020 (Jan 1 2020 – Dec 27 2020). More specifically, the research question that guided this study is: What are the factors that shape the incidence of COVID-19 cases in NHs in Midwestern states?



Three datasets were combined from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): 1. Star rating; 2. Provider information and 3. COVID-19 nursing home reported cases. The period examined is from Jan 1 – Dec 27, 2020, for the 12 Midwestern states in the population set (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin). This time period includes one year of data for the analysis, providing a more longitudinal picture of what occurred in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our sample size consisted of 4390 free-standing NHs, after removing cases with missing values.
We combined COVID-19 NH cases data with CMS and provider information. The provider information includes star ratings in three domains (health inspection rating, quality measure rating, staffing rating) and the star ratings range from one(low) to five (high). The health inspection domains are based on the three most recent standard surveys for each nursing home that result from any complaint investigation during the recent three years. The quality measure rating is based on indicators to describe the quality of care given in each nursing home. These measures address a wide range of functioning and health status in multiple care areas. The staffing domain is based on self-reported data from the nursing homes on the number of hours worked by their nursing staff, including Registered Nurse (RN) + Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) + Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) hours and the number of residents in the facility.
Drawing on a recent study, we grouped nursing homes into three categories (19) based on the number of COVID-19 cases: those with (a) 10 cases or fewer, (b) 11 to 30 cases, and (c) more than 30 cases. Other measures used were self-reported information on ratings, overall star rating (1 to 5-star facilities), staff shortages, PPE shortage, number of beds, occupancy rate, and ownership status (profit, non-profit, government), and nursing staffing level hours per resident per day (RN, LPN, CNA). Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine the association between nursing home characteristics and incidence of COVID-19 cases.
Descriptive analyses in Table 1 show COVID-19 cases, Midwestern states, and NH characteristics. Three separate ordinal logistic regressions were conducted to examine the three domains associated with COVID-19 cases and assess the odds of high-performing facilities (4- or 5-star facilities) having more than 30 cases vs 11 to 30 cases vs 10 or fewer cases relative to low-performing facilities (1- to 3-star facilities). These factors were compared with reported resident COVID-19 cases and the statistical significance was tested between NHs having more than 30 cases vs 11 to 30 cases vs. 10 or fewer cases of COVID-19. Statistical measures used were ANOVA for nominal variables, Spearman r for ordinal variables, and Pearson correlation tests for continuous variables.
Further analysis to understand the impact and effect of NH ownership structure on COVID-19 cases was done using the ANCOVA analysis to control for NH size.
All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS V. 27, and two-sided p values were considered significant at p<0.01.



Of the 4390 NHs in 12 Midwestern states, when we compared the low-performing facilities and high performing NHs, the high performers were less likely to have more than 30 COVID-19 cases for two of the CMS performance domains (health inspections, 520 [27.6%] high performers vs 1363 [72.4%] low performers; and staffing 773 (41.1%) vs 1110 (58.9%) (see Tables 1 & 2). Table 1 shows the number of nursing homes in each Midwestern state for each CMS domain, classified into high-performing and low-performing.

Table 1
Characteristics of High-Performing vs Low-Performing Nursing Homes Across 3 CMS Performance Domains in the Order of Number of Nursing Homes in Each State

Table 2
Association Between Nursing Home Ratings of Health Inspections, Quality Measures, and Nurse Staffing Domains with COVID-19 Cases


Table 3 provides the distribution of NH COVID-19 cases in each of the Midwestern States, with Ohio having the biggest share of NH COVID -19 cases and South Dakota having the lowest.
Illinois by far and away had the most large sized NHs. Ohio had the most NHs overall and was the state with the most medium sized facilities. Interestingly, as a percent of total beds, Missouri had the highest percent of middle sized NHs.

Table 3
State wide Distribution of Nursing Homes with COVID-19 Cases in Descending Order Based on the “All COVID-19 NH Cases”

* n = 4334; Data not available for 56 NH


NHs with high ratings on health inspection and nurse staffing were less likely to have more than 30 COVID-19 cases vs facilities with 11 to 30 and vs facilities with 10 or fewer cases than were low-performing NHs (OR, 0.68; 95% CI(.567-.823; P = <.01), (OR, 0.48; 95% CI(.418-.557; P = <.01). There was no significant association between high- vs low-performing NHs in the quality measures domains with COVID-19 cases.
While PPE shortages was a major concern in the early part of 2020, this study did not find any statistically significant impact of PPE on the incidence of COVID-19 cases (Table 4). There was no statistically significant association between self-reported staff shortages and COVID-19 cases.

Table 4
Nursing Home Characteristics, Covid-19 Factors, and Star rating

** p<0.01, * p<0.05, ***p<.001; *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); CV-Corona Virus; P values measures whether nursing homes of residents with COVID-19 cases using ANOVA for nominal variables, spearman r for ordinal variables, and Pearson correlation tests for continues variables; Ownership P value = ANOVA; Overall star rating P value = spearman r


Ownership of NHs (for-profit vs. not-for-profit vs. government) also showed a statistically significant (p<.001) association with incidence of COVID-19 cases (See Table 4). The data shows that for-profit NHs had more COVID-19 cases than not-for-profit and government owned. In this dataset, 60.4% were for-profit, 7.8% were government owned and 31.8% were not-for-profit nursing homes. In the category of NHs with less than 10 cases 53.2% were for-profit, 9.7% were government and 37.1% were not-for- profit. Whereas in NHs with over 30 cases of COVID-19, 67.9% were for-profit, 6.6% were government owned and 25.4% were not-for-profit. This could be because there are more for-profit nursing homes than government owned and non-profit.
To further understand the ownership effect, an ANCOVA analysis was performed to control for NH size measured by number of beds. The results of ANCOVA (see Table 5) clearly show a statistically significant (F=20.1** p<0.01) association between ownership and COVID-19 cases after controlling for number of beds. We did a post hoc analysis (Bonferroni comparison) for NH ownership and found that there is statistically significant difference between for-profit vs government (mean difference 6.82** p< 0.01) and statistically significant difference between for-profit and non-profit (mean difference 3.77** p< 0.01) and there was no significant difference between not-for-profit and government ownership (mean difference -3.05 p=.09). This additional analysis indicates that for-profit NHs were significantly different from both government-owned and non-profit NHs, when it came to the number of COVID-19 cases.
COVID-19 cases also increased with the number of beds in the nursing homes. NHs with over 30 COVID-19 cases had an average of 114.8 beds, whereas NHs with less than 10 COVID-19 cases had only 70.9 beds on average. This association is statistically significant (p<.01) (See Table 4). However, there was a statistically significant but small negative correlation between occupancy rate and COVID-19 cases, NHs with less than 10 COVID-19 cases had slightly higher occupancy than NHs with over 30 cases of COVID-19. The average occupancy rate was 65.8% and there was not much variance in this when compared based on COVID-19 cases. There was also a low negative correlation between number of beds and occupancy rate r=-0.155 p<0.01(data not shown).
There was also a statistically significant (p<.01) association between star ratings of NHs and the incidence of COVID-19 cases (Table 4). The data shows there were fewer nursing homes with 5-star rating in the over 30 COVID-19 cases. Of the NHs that had 1-star rating 57.6% had more than 30 COVID-19 cases, whereas only 29.5% of NHs that had 5-star rating had more than 30 COVID-19 cases. Similarly, only 19.4% NHs with 1-star rating had less than 10 cases of COVID-19 while 39.1% of NHs with 5-star rating had less than 10 cases of COVID-19.
While there was no significant association between self-reported staff shortages and COVID-19 cases, staff hours per resident of RN and CNA, had a statistically significant (p<.001) negative association. i.e., the more RN and CNA hours per resident, the lower the number of COVID-19 cases. In NHs with less than 10 COVID-19 cases, the staffing hours per resident was on average .96 RN hours and 1.69 CNA hours where it was only .61 RN hours and 1.46 CNA hours in NHs with more than 30 COVID-19 cases (see Table 4). However, in the case of LPN hours, there was positive association with COVID-19 cases, i.e., as the number of LPN hours increased, so did the incidence of COVID-19 cases. In NHs that had less than 10 COVID-19 cases, LPN hours per resident was on average .72 hours, but in NHs that had more than 30 cases, there were .77 LPN hours on average. The difference is small, but it was statistically significant with p<.001. On further analysis, we also found that while there is a positive correlation for RN and CNA hours with star rating (RN .432** & CNA .307** p<.01), there was a statistically significant negative correlation between LPN hours and star rating (LPN -.073** p<.01). In addition, RN and CNA hours were negatively correlated with number of beds (RN -206**, CNA -.118**, p<.01), LPN hours were positively correlated with number of beds (LPN .116**, p<.01).

Table 5
Association between Ownership and COVID-19 cases after controlling for number of beds

**p < 0.01



The distribution of NH COVID-19 cases among the Midwestern states seems to be highly correlated with size and population density of these states. However, Illinois was leading in the number of COVID-19 cases until October 2020 (21). The metropolitan city of Chicago (in Illinois) with high population density could have been the reason for Illinois to be leading in COVID-19 cases until Oct 2020. Chicago and Illinois were also one of the first cities and states to experience more COVID-19 cases early on in the pandemic (22). When data from Nov and Dec 2020 were included in the analysis, Ohio led in number of cases. In all Midwestern states, COVID-19 cases doubled when the Nov and Dec 2020 data were added to the data from Jan-Oct 2020 (21).
From National Organization of State Offices of Rural Health (NOSORH) data, Ohio is the only Midwestern state with no frontier population, while S. Dakota and N. Dakota had more than 30% frontier population (23). Frontier areas have very low population density. State-by-state differences in NH COVID-19 rates could also be due to differences in state-level policies on social distancing, mask wearing, level of community spread, and variation in testing and reporting. Variations in reporting format, case definitions and update frequency were also indicated as barrier in another study (11).
The number of beds was positively associated with higher COVID-19 cases, consistent with prior studies (in other States) (11, 13, 18). There have been some studies that have found that smaller NHs, especially greenhouse NHs fared better in the COVID-19 pandemic (13). The stated reasons were that smaller NHs’ residents have better psychosocial well-being, such NHs are usually not-for-profit, and that the resident case mix usually have less minority population (that are often at higher mortality risk) (13). It could also be that larger nursing homes have higher number of staff; spread of COVID-19 through staff is another aspect that some studies have indicated (24), where surges where highly correlated with increase in staff and resident cases. Staff testing was also not fully implemented in around 12% of facilities according to another study (25). This finding is consistent with other studies that indicate smaller sized nursing homes are associated with better quality care (5, 26). Since, COVID-19 is highly contagious in crowded areas, the analysis checked for associations with overcrowding i.e. occupancy in these NHs. However, our findings show that NH COVID-19 cases are negatively correlated with occupancy rate. One possible explanation for this negative relationship is larger NHs tend to have lower occupancy rates.
This study also found a correlation between NH ownership status and COVID-19 cases. From our analysis, for-profit NHs were more likely to have higher rates of COVID-19 cases. Other studies have reported similar findings (14, 18) and a news report (27) also noted that for-profit nursing homes are not faring well in controlling COVID-19. While other studies report a correlation between NH ownership and COVID-19, our analysis included multiple tests to confirm the statistically significant relationship between ownership and COVID-19. Potential explanations for this finding include the tendency for there to be more beds in for-profit facilities, the facilities being larger in general and also usually located in urban areas that has larger proportion of minority population (28). Our study further indicated that for-profit NHs had more cases even after controlling for NH size. In this study, there was a negative correlation between for-profit ownership and 5-star rating and with RN and CNA staffing hours. Poor star rating is associated with lower RN staffing hours and high staff turnover rates (29). Also, for-profit status is associated with higher LPN staffing hours, which could indicate that for-profits are utilizing LPNs (to reduce costs), instead of RNs.
A limitation of the current study is that other factors such as health and functional status of the resident at admission, rate of resident admissions from the community or from the hospital and the population density of the city or town in which the NH is located, could also affect the COVID-19 cases in NHs. However, these factors could not be part of the analysis as CMS database does not have these measures.
Across the 12 Midwestern states, high-performing NHs, especially in terms of health inspection ratings and nurse staffing, had fewer COVID-19 cases than low-performing NHs. This is consistent with prior studies that have focused on other states (19). These findings do indicate that such performance measures are important and they do indicate poor staffing and poor health standards needs to be addressed (10). Poor health standards and nurse staffing shortages can make an NH more vulnerable to future pandemics.
Our study findings also reveal another nursing staff -related insight; specifically, higher RN and CNA hours correlated with lower COVID-19 cases, whereas LPN staff hours lead to higher COVID-19 cases. These findings are consistent with other nursing home studies that link quality care with higher and more qualified staffing (30). However, more research is needed that examines whether it is the reduction of RNs or something specific to LPN training that impacted the COVID-19 cases. We also found from further analysis that LPN hours were negatively correlated with star ratings, indicating a link to quality care. LPN hours was also positively correlated with number of beds, indicating that larger NHs tend to hire more LPNs and from this study and others, we know that the size of the NH is positively associated with higher COVID-19 cases.


Conclusion and Implications

While vaccination campaigns are well underway and will limit the spread of COVID-19, nursing homes are still vulnerable to mutations of the virus and other endemics. The frailty, age and multiple chronic conditions of this population make them especially vulnerable and the safety of older adults in NHs should remain top priority. This study of NHs in Midwestern states indicate that the NH factors that are most associated with a higher prevalence of COVID-19 cases are size of the nursing home/number of beds, for-profit ownership, star ratings, and RN and CNA hours per resident per day. We depart from prior studies on this topic by examining self-reported NH data for the entire year of 2020 (Jan 1 2020 – Dec 27 2020) and by specifically focusing on all the Midwestern states. Our analysis findings imply the potential to use a minimal set of indicators to predict the future incidence of COVID-19 pandemic (and other endemics) among NH residents and inform on appropriate policy considerations to reduce NH vulnerabilities in this context. Future studies could consider state-wide policies to limit community spread and impact on COVID-19 cases in NHs. In addition, studies could also evaluate the impact of the adoption of COVID-19 related policies within NHs such as visitation and staff testing on the incidence of COVID-19 cases and evaluate the impact of providing more resources in terms of qualified staffing and care practices that promote strong infection control on the spread of diseases such as COVID-19. Future studies could consider integrating external data, such as government policy changes, magnitude of the COVID-19 outbreak and attitudes of the population in that region towards the pandemic and the restrictions imposed, with the CMS data to understand how that impacted COVID-19 cases in NHs in that region.


Conflict of Interest: Priya Nambisan: No conflict of Interest to report. Mohammed Abahussain: No conflict of Interest to report. Colleen Galambos: No conflict of Interest to report. Bo Zhang: No conflict of Interest to report. Elizabeth Bukowy: No conflict of Interest to report; Edmund Duthie: . No conflict of Interest to report.

Funding sources: This research did not receive any funding from agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. All authors meet criteria for authorship as stated in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals. All authors contributed to the analysis of the data, interpretation of the results and writing of the paper.



1. AARP. COVID-19 Nursing Home Resident and Staff Deaths: AARP Nursing Home Dashboard. AARP. Published March 2021. Accessed March 28, 2021. https://www.aarp.org/ppi/issues/caregiving/info-2020/nursing-home-covid-dashboard.html
2. Ouslander JG, Grabowski DC. COVID-19 in Nursing Homes: Calming the Perfect Storm. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(10):2153-2162. doi:10.1111/jgs.16784
3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid. Upcoming Requirements for Notification of Confirmed COVID-19 (or COVID19 Persons Under Investigation) Among Residents and Staff in Nursing Homes.; 2020.
4. Barnett ML, Grabowski DC. Nursing Homes Are Ground Zero for COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Health Forum. 2020;1(3):e200369. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.0369
5. Shippee TP, Henning-Smith C, Kane RL, Lewis T. Resident- and Facility-Level Predictors of Quality of Life in Long-Term Care. The Gerontologist. 2015;55(4):643-655. doi:10.1093/geront/gnt148
6. Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, Expenditures, and Complications of Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Elderly. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(20):2269. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.20.2269
7. Zhang X, Dou Q, Zhang W, et al. Frailty as a Predictor of All-Cause Mortality Among Older Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20(6):657-663.e4. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.018
8. Chow N, Fleming-Dutra K, Gierke R, et al. Preliminary Estimates of the Prevalence of Selected Underlying Health Conditions Among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 — United States, February 12–March 28, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(13):382-386. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6913e2
9. Fallon A, Dukelow T, Kennelly SP, O’Neill D. COVID-19 in nursing homes. QJM Int J Med. 2020;113(6):391-392. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcaa136
10. Davidson PM, Szanton SL. Nursing homes and COVID-19: We can and should do better. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(15-16):2758-2759. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15297
11. Abrams HR, Loomer L, Gandhi A, Grabowski DC. Characteristics of U.S. Nursing Homes with COVID-19 Cases. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(8):1653-1656. doi:10.1111/jgs.16661
12. Gorges RJ, Konetzka RT. Factors Associated With Racial Differences in Deaths Among Nursing Home Residents With COVID-19 Infection in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037431. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37431
13. Zimmerman S, Dumond-Stryker C, Tandan M, et al. Nontraditional Small House Nursing Homes Have Fewer COVID-19 Cases and Deaths. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22(3):489-493. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.01.069
14. Chatterjee P, Kelly S, Qi M, Werner RM. Characteristics and Quality of US Nursing Homes Reporting Cases of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(7):e2016930. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16930
15. He M, Li Y, Fang F. Is There a Link between Nursing Home Reported Quality and COVID-19 Cases? Evidence from California Skilled Nursing Facilities. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(7):905-908. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.016
16. Li Y, Temkin-Greener H, Shan G, Cai X. COVID-19 Infections and Deaths among Connecticut Nursing Home Residents: Facility Correlates. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(9):1899-1906. doi:10.1111/jgs.16689
17. Bui DP, See I, Hesse EM, et al. Association Between CMS Quality Ratings and COVID-19 Outbreaks in Nursing Homes — West Virginia, March 17–June 11, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(37):1300-1304. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6937a5
18. Unruh MA, Yun H, Zhang Y, Braun RT, Jung H-Y. Nursing Home Characteristics Associated With COVID-19 Deaths in Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(7):1001-1003. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.06.019
19. Figueroa JF, Wadhera RK, Papanicolas I, et al. Association of Nursing Home Ratings on Health Inspections, Quality of Care, and Nurse Staffing With COVID-19 Cases. JAMA. 2020;324(11):1103. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.14709
20. Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91-93. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
21. Nambisan, P., Abahussain, M., Duthie, E., Galambos, C., Zhang, B., & Bukowy, E.. Factors Associated with Increase in COVID-19 Cases in Nursing Homes: A Study of Nursing Homes in Midwestern States. J Am Geriatric Soc. 2021l;69(S1):S217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.17115
22. Wang J. Data from over 200 U.S. urban areas highlight need for more aggressive countermeasures. UChicago News. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/coronavirus-hitting-larger-cities-harder-how-should-they-respond. Published March 21, 2020. Accessed April 22, 2021.
23. Hirsch S. Everything You’ve Always Wanted to Know About Rural ? NOSORH Natl Organ State Off Rural Health Httpsnosorhorg. Published online September 2014:44.
24. McMichael TM, Currie DW, Clark S, et al. Epidemiology of Covid-19 in a Long-Term Care Facility in King County, Washington. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(21):2005-2011. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2005412
25. Konetzka RT, Gorges RJ. Nothing Much Has Changed: COVID-19 Nursing Home Cases and Deaths Follow Fall Surges. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(1):46-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16951
26. Judith A. Lucas EdD B APN, PhD CAL, Timothy J. Lowe PhD L LSW, et al. The Relationship Between Organizational Factors and Resident Satisfaction with Nursing Home Care and Life. J Aging Soc Policy. 2007;19(2):125-151. doi:10.1300/J031v19n02_07
27. For-profit nursing homes are ‘worst performers’ in new COVID-19 analysis – News. McKnight’s Long Term Care News. Published February 19, 2021. Accessed March 27, 2021. https://www.mcknights.com/news/for-profit-nursing-homes-are-worst-performers-in-new-covid-19-analysis/
28. Sugg MM, Spaulding TJ, Lane SJ, et al. Mapping community-level determinants of COVID-19 transmission in nursing homes: A multi-scale approach. Sci Total Environ. 2021;752:141946. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141946
29. Gandhi A, Yu H, Grabowski DC. High Nursing Staff Turnover In Nursing Homes Offers Important Quality Information: Study examines high turnover of nursing staff at US nursing homes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2021;40(3):384-391. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00957
30. Spilsbury K, Hewitt C, Stirk L, Bowman C. The relationship between nurse staffing and quality of care in nursing homes: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):732-750. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.02.014



R.J. Fischer

Corresponding author: Robert J. Fischer, MD, Mann-Grandstaff Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4815 N. Assembly Street, Spokane, WA 99205, USA, Email: robert.fischer@va.gov, Phone: 509-434-7200

Jour Nursing Home Res 2020;6:69-72
Published online September 10, 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jnhrs.2020.19



We report a case series of 38 patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) evacuated to Mann-Grandstaff Veterans Affairs Medical Center (MGVAMC) in Spokane, Washington following disease outbreak in a skilled nursing home (SNH). Range of symptoms were none to mild on transfer. Patients were admitted to stem the outbreak, provide enhanced medical care and improve clinical outcome. The nursing home outbreak was arrested within two weeks of the initial patient transfer and mortality in this cohort was 13.2%.

Key words: COVID-19, skilled nursing home, outbreak, evacuation, mortality.



As of July 7, the United States has suffered the largest number of COVID-19 confirmed cases (2,980,906) and deaths (131,248) worldwide, representing roughly a quarter of all cases and deaths globally (1). According to the American Geriatrics Society, nursing home residents are among the most vulnerable to complications and death from COVID-19 and represent a particular challenge in diagnosis and infection control owing to the frequent absence of typical symptoms along with the highly contagious nature of the disease (2), even among asymptomatic patients (3).
As of June 28, there have been 126,402 COVID-19 confirmed cases in nursing homes and 33,517 deaths with a fatality rate of 28% (4). Nursing home cases represent 4% of all COVID-19 cases in the US but 26% of deaths (33,509 of 131,248). Of the 1.3 million residents in 15,600 nursing homes, 9.7% have contracted COVID-19 by recent reporting. Two or more cases were experienced in 30.1% of the 14,577 reporting nursing homes, however, 129 facilities suffered 100 or more cases as of June 28. Overall, 5,522 (37.9%) had at least one infected resident (5).
Here we report on a COVID-19 outbreak in a SNH and the results of our efforts to stem infection and improve resident outcome.



This observational case series describes a cohort of 38 COVID-19 patients evacuated from a 100-bed local SNH to a designated acute care unit in the MGVAMC in Spokane, Washington between April 24 and June 2, 2020 after testing positive for infection. Patients were asymptomatic or only mildly symptomatic at time of transfer and would normally not meet hospital admission criteria. The goals of hospitalization were to stem the outbreak by removing infected patients from the SNH and provide enhanced medical care to prevent disease progression. At a minimum, daily physician rounding was conducted and a high nurse-to-patient ratio maintained (1:3 to 1:4). Consultation with physical and respiratory therapy, nutritional services, pharmacy, physiatry, rehabilitation services, audiology, social work, chaplaincy and other services were readily provided as necessary. Oral and fluid intake were monitored closely, and electrolyte imbalance corrected when identified.
Real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) sample collection was performed at MGVAMC by swabbing the nasopharynx. Testing was accomplished using the Cepheid GeneXpert™ rapid testing platform. All sample collection and processing followed CDC guidelines. Demographic and clinical data and information related to comorbidities were abstracted from electronic medical records (Department of Veteran Affairs Computerized Patient Records System, CPRS). A case was determined to be symptomatic if there was presence of fever, cough, shortness of breath or if the attending physician diagnosed symptomatic COVID-19 at any point during the hospitalization. The duration of viral shedding is defined as the number of days between the first positive COVID-19 test and the last positive test prior to two serial negative tests at least 24 hours apart. The COVID-19 case duration is the number of days between an initial positive test and the second negative test 24 hours after the initial negative test (test of cure). For those who succumbed, the date of decease was used as an end date for both measures. Data to calculate the Modified National Early Warning System (NEWS) (6) score was obtained from review of admission notes in the electronic health record.
Patients were returned to the SNH following hospitalization at MGVAMC only after strict discharge criteria were met: two negative RT-PCR tests at least 24 hours apart, or a period of 30 days had elapsed since the first positive test if negative testing could not be achieved; and no new resident or staff cases identified in the SNH for two consecutive weeks. For those residents still shedding virus after 30 days and returned to the SNH, isolation was required until two serial negative tests were obtained. At the time of the outbreak, there were 86 residents present in the SNH with a first resident case identified on April 6. By the time of evacuation (April 24), 35 residents and 12 staff had already tested positive for COVID-19.



Table 1 is a summary of the demographic and clinical findings of the cohort of 38 patients on admission to MGVAMC. The median age was 83 with a male to female ratio of 3 to 1. The most prevalent underlying conditions associated with severe COVID-19 disease were hypertension (68.4%) and cardiac disease (57.9%). The median number of these comorbidities was 2.0 (IQR, 1.3-3.0) with a maximum of 5 conditions. Additionally, 57.9% of patients suffered from dementia. The median number of medical problems listed in the electronic health record was 22. Moreover, 76.3% of patients requested to continue or initiate “do not attempt resuscitation” status after goals of care discussions with the attending physician. Many in the cohort suffered from a wide array of serious conditions such as Huntington’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, liver disease, post-traumatic stress disorder and history of stroke.

Table 1
Demographics and Findings

*Underlying conditions (comorbidities) known to be a risk for Severe COVID-19 (as of April 24, 2020); †Electronic Health Record; ‡A count of problems excluding COVID-19; §Modified National Early Warning Score of 5-6 represents medium risk progression to severe disease; ||Viral shedding is duration between initial RT-PCR positive test and last positive test; {Among those who died – duration is between initial test and date of decease; #Case duration is days between a first positive test and second negative testing for COVID-19; **A second negative RT-PCR test for COVID-19 repeated 24 hours after previous negative test. Results of RT-PCR testing obtained from Apr 24 to June 24.

Notably, 44.7% of the cohort remained asymptomatic throughout hospitalization with 13.2% unable to respond verbally to questions owing to underlying conditions. The median Modified National Early Warning Score (an indicator of risk of clinical deterioration) was 5.0 (IQR, 3.0-6.0). A score of 5-6 indicates a medium risk for progression to severe COVID-19. Twenty patients (52.6%) had a score equal to or greater than 5 while 7 (18.4%) a score compatible with high risk. The mortality rate for the cohort was 13.2% (5 patients). One of 38 evacuated patients received RemdesivirTM (Gilead Sciences) antiviral therapy by protocol and did well. No patients received hydroxychloroquine, but several patients did receive antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. One patient in the cohort was transiently admitted to the ICU for cardiac-related issues unrelated to COVID-19.
Viral shedding showed a median duration of 29.0 days (IQR, 20.3-36.8) with a maximum of 71. Case duration, a median of 49.0 days (IQR, 24.0-56.8) and a maximum of 77. The cohort underwent serial RT-PCR testing at intervals between one and two weeks to minimize patient discomfort and test kit consumption.
Prior to SNH resident evacuation to MGVAMC, 35 residents and 12 staff were infected between March 23 and April 24 (32 days). Following evacuation, the last case occurred on May 11 (staff member), 17 days later. As of this publication, no additional resident cases have been detected (Figure 1). Overall, 46 of 83 residents contracted COVID-19 (55.4%) and 10 patients died (21.7%) during the period of this study. Of the 38 patients evacuated to MGVAMC, the case fatality rate was 13.2%.

Figure 1
Skilled Nursing Home Outbreak and Testing



With respect to infection transmission in nursing homes, it is important to recognize that there is frequent, prolonged and close contact between frail patients and staff during activities of daily living (ADLs). Assistance is required for ambulating, feeding, dressing, personal hygiene, continence and toileting (7). Lai et al. (2020) point out that nursing home “residents share the same sources of air, food, water, caregivers, and medical care” and are exposed to visitors who come and go at will (8). These factors contribute to the high degree of COVID-19 penetration in skilled nursing homes in the US (5) and may explain the difficulty with outbreak control experienced by the SNH we observed before evacuation of infected residents to MGVAMC.
Our findings serve to highlight the extent of underlying health and cognitive conditions and disabilities among SNH residents. There is also growing evidence nursing home resident comorbidities including Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD) contribute strongly to coronavirus mortality in skilled nursing homes (9). For example, it is difficult to elicit a reliable history from cognitively impaired patients and they often present with atypical symptoms (10); as a consequence, they are at risk for delay in diagnosis of symptomatic and serious infection. Fully 60% of our cohort were cognitively impaired. Comorbidities, cognitive disability, persistent absence of symptoms of infection and the impact of immunosenescence (11) combined to mask typical signs and symptoms of disease and made detection of progressive COVID-19 a challenge for the MGVAMC caregivers. This difficulty with accurate assessment, triage and treatment would be an even greater challenge in the SNH setting.
The duration of viral shedding may provide important insight into the severity of COVID-19 in our cohort. These patients experienced a median duration of viral shedding of 29 days. This is comparable to findings from Wuhan, China showing a median of 31 days in patients with severe COVID-19 (12). The duration of viral shedding in asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic younger patients has been reported to show a median of only 19 days (13). Furthermore, advanced age and comorbidities do not appear to play a role in the duration of viral shedding (12, 14). A possible explanation for prolonged viral shedding in our cohort, therefore, may be more advanced COVID-19 than is apparent on daily clinical assessment in the SNH. This is borne out by our findings that over half of the cohort had a Modified NEWS score of 5 or more on evacuation and admission to MGVAMC.
Our cohort is likely representative of nursing home residents everywhere insofar as they are elderly, poor historians, suffer from numerous serious health conditions, and may often present atypically (2) and with blunted fever response to infection (15). The ability to distinguish symptoms of COVID-19 from those associated with underlying health conditions along with an attenuated physiologic response to infection combine to place nursing home residents at serious risk for delay in appropriate comprehensive supportive care with subsequent rapid progression of infection and suboptimal outcome.
Our decision to evacuate the SNH residents to our hospital appeared to have a salutary effect on outbreak control. Seventeen days after implementing evacuation procedures, no further cases of COVID-19 had been identified among residents or staff.
There are significant limitations to this case series. The number of patients is small (38), observations are retrospective, and the study does not have a matched control group for comparison purposes.
Our findings do suggest that early evacuation of COVID-19 residents from the SNH stemmed the outbreak and improved patient outcomes by timely hospitalization and robust multidisciplinary medical care following positive testing. In order to avoid prolonged isolation, however, additional research is needed to resolve the question of infectivity in residents who continue to test positive for COVID-19 over very long periods of time.

Acknowledgments: This material is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Mann-Grandstaff Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Spokane, Washington, USA. The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government. I would like to acknowledge the men and women of Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center for their dedication and skill in the care of community patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and in fulfilling Veterans Affairs’ fourth mission. I also would like to recognize Stephen D. Fischer for his invaluable assistance in proofreading this submission.

Funding: This observational study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The author declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Conflict of interest: None.

Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.


1. COVID-19 Dashboard, Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE), Johns Hopkins University (JHU), Coronavirus Resource Center. Accessed 7 June 2020. Available at: https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
2. Goldstein A, Hollmann P, Lundebjerg N, Ouslander J, Saliba D, Unroe K. American Geriatrics Society Policy Brief: Covid-19 and Nursing Homes, American Geriatrics Society, Special Article. JAGS 2020; 68:908-911. Accessed 20 May 20 2020. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.16477
3. Mizumoto K, Kagaya K, Zarebski A, Chowell G. Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020. Euro Surveill 2020;25(10):pii=2000180. Accessed 12 June 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.10.2000180
4. Data.CMS.gov; COVID-19 Nursing Home Data, Submitted Data as of Week Ending: 6/21/2020. Accessed 7 July 2020. Available at: https://data.cms.gov/stories/s/COVID-19-Nursing-Home-Data/bkwz-xpvg
5. Data.CMS.gov. COVID-19 Nursing Home Dataset. Accessed 12 July 2020. Available at: https://data.cms.gov/Special-Programs-Initiatives-COVID-19-Nursing-Home/COVID-19-Nursing-Home-Dataset/s2uc-8wxp/data
6. Liao X, Wang B, Kang Y. Novel coronavirus infection during the 2019–2020 epidemic: preparing intensive care units—the experience in Sichuan Province, China. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:357–360. Accessed May 19, 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-05954-2
7. Edemokong P, Bomgaars D, Sukumaran S. Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), StatPearls [Internet], updated 12 Apr 2020. Accessed 7 June 2020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470404/
8. Lai C-C, Wang J-H, Ko, W-C, et al. COVID-19 in long-term care facilities: An upcoming threat that cannot be ignored. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection 2020; 53(3):444-446. Accessed 20 June 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.04.008
9. Brown E, Kumar S, Rajii T, Pollock B, Mulsant B. Anticipating and Mitigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias. Am J of Geriatric Psychiatry 2020; 28(7):712-721. Accessed 7 June 2020. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748120302943?via%3Dihub
10. Isaia G, Marinello R, Tibaldi V, Tamone C, Bo M. Atypical Presentation of Covid-19 in an Older Adult with Severe Alzheimer Disease. Letter to the Editor. Am J of Geriatric Psychiatry 2020; 28(7)790-791. Accessed 6 June 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2020.04.018
11. Aw D, Silva A, Palmer D. Immunosenescence: emerging challenges for an ageing population. Immunology 2007; 120(4):435–446. Accessed 6 June 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02555.x
12. Zhou B, She J, Wang Y, Ma X. The duration of viral shedding of discharged patients with severe Covid-19. Clinical Infectious Disease 2020; XX(XX):1-3 [Preprint]. Accessed 24 May 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa451
13. Miyamae Y, Hayashi T, Yonezawa H, et al. Duration of viral shedding in asymptomatic or mild cases of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from a cruise ship: A single-hospital experience in Tokyo, Japan. IJID 2020; 97: 293-295. Accessed 12 July 2020. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220304562
14. Qi L, Yang Y, Jiang D, et al. Factors associated with the duration of viral shedding in adults with COVID-19 outside of Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study, International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2020; 96:531-537. Accessed 12 July 2020. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1201971220303520
15. Castle S, Normal D, Yeh M, Miller D, Yoshikawa T. Fever response in elderly nursing home residents: Are the older truly colder? JAGS 39(9):853-857. Accessed 12 July 2020. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.15325415.1991.tb04450.x?sid=nlm%3Apubmed